> > in response to the request made by Evil_Bob on OFTC#suckless > > i hereby supply the patch "sbase" > > and the proposed version of "eprintf.c" > > as i believe it should look like. > > > > http://file.bestmx.net/ee/suckless/ >
> Now, what you did here is rip out this status code handling No, i didn't > In sbase, we have this more or less "scheme" how function naming > works. how is it relevant to the topic?
