On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:23:12 +0100
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> I’m working on an efficient »male« classifier. We already pointed out on
> IRC that male code is stronger and can repair a carburator of a car. Fe‐
> male code is more vebose, more instinctive and has more feelings but
> can’t bear children. I’m still codifying this approach.
Thm 1.3.3.7: Let s be a suckless user from the set S of suckless users. Then
f: S->{0,1}, f(s)=1 is a valid male classifier.
Proof: Assume f(s)=0. This is a statistically significant contradiction. Q.E.D.
--
FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
