Greetings. On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:23:12 +0100 Markus Teich <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > how about "age" and "size" attributes too, > > just to ensure age and size "equalities". > > Heyho, > > I am looking forward to 1% commits adding the word "mum" or "dad" in random > places. How do you plan to check if all the SLoC are evenly distributed > between > the different attributes? Or do you plan to even look at a character-level > distribution? Is a suckless pre-receive hook already in the making rejecting > all > commits which break the equality?
I’m working on an efficient »male« classifier. We already pointed out on IRC that male code is stronger and can repair a carburator of a car. Fe‐ male code is more vebose, more instinctive and has more feelings but can’t bear children. I’m still codifying this approach. The second point in the discussion was that there is a »nogender« posi‐ tion, which should allow an explict specification of a »nogender« tag. I propose a »nonogender« tag, which says that you don’t want »nogender« tags. I will keep the list updated on the discussion. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann 💻 http://r-36.net 💻 gopher://r-36.net ☺ http://r-36.net/about 🔐 1C3B 7E6F 9805 E5C8 C0BD 1F7F EA21 7AAC 09A9 CB55 🔐 http://r-36.net/about/20h.asc 📧 [email protected]
