Then fine, set the default as whatever width you like for symbol wrapping, but should that not be done client-side? For example, when quoting, won't the text be pushed out further than that hard-wrap limit?
Presumably, prior to sending you are still using soft wrapping and then it adds the hard-wrapping after, correct? Otherwise you would need to manually rewrap when adding a word. Why not merely move this step to the receiver? On 2015-11-30, at 02:22, Timothy Rice <[email protected]> wrote: >> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead >> of line wrapping client-side? > > I think someone has just volunteered to submit an RFC on how to send > electronic mail between computers with a multitude of different > architectures and screen sizes on the internet in the 21st century. > > Because, you know, the problem hasn't already been dealt with before, and > the people who never dealt with it in the past have no reason for saying > that things are best done in a certain way in the present.
