On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:55:32PM -0800, Louis Santillan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM, David Phillips <dbphillip...@gmail.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
I intend to do some more widespread testing on a large sample of
different images which I can share the results on. But I can confirm
that as it stands bzip2 looks likely to be the best candidate.
Try lzham [0] (for more compression, better utilization of multicore,
faster than bzip2, 7zip, zlib) or lz4 [1] (zlib level of compression
with near memcpy speed decompression).
[0] https://github.com/richgel999/lzham_codec
[1] https://github.com/Cyan4973/lz4
Or try the new compression with brotli.
--
_____________________________________
< Do what you like, like what you do. >
-------------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||
