On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM, David Phillips <dbphillip...@gmail.com> wrote: [SNIP] > I intend to do some more widespread testing on a large sample of > different images which I can share the results on. But I can confirm > that as it stands bzip2 looks likely to be the best candidate.
Try lzham [0] (for more compression, better utilization of multicore, faster than bzip2, 7zip, zlib) or lz4 [1] (zlib level of compression with near memcpy speed decompression). [0] https://github.com/richgel999/lzham_codec [1] https://github.com/Cyan4973/lz4
