Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Well executing swerc for each request is still overhead. But for the sake of > not doing weirdo stuff (like hiding .html or redirecting from previously known > URL to some .html file) in order to keep all the links to suckless.org intact, > I'm not inclined to disable the swerc approach atm.
Heyho Anselm, Most static site generators I've seen just use the approach, that every folder has a index.html, so that http://st.suckless.org/patches/ dispalys the st.suckless.org/patches/index.html file. I'm not that much into web stuff to know if that is called „.html hiding“ or what the disadvantages would be. However I know that it would allow for keeping all current links intact. --Markus
