On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 21:45:59 +0100 Markus Teich <markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de> wrote:
> I do not think the current design sucks at all. It's functional, clear and has > an easy to grasp structure. If you don't dig the css, you can easily adapt it, > it's pretty clear also. I agree with you here. It's semantically correct and the structure is good. However, I think what prototype meant is in regard to the use of imagery on the site, which could be improved (and which I'm trying to adress here a bit). Also, I would not take his statement too literally, as it was more or less a funny remark in our "suckless" terms. ;) > A much bigger problem I see is swerc, which still has not been modified to > statically generate the page[0] (I think I reported this more than a year > ago...). > Every pageload is rendered live, although there are no elements, which need > that > and the pages could easily be rendered to static html. So don't bikeshed too > much until this is fixed. Yes, this is a good point! If I wasn't occupied with sbase and exams currently, I'd look at the issue. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
