On 18/11/2014, Louis Santillan <lpsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Returning error code doesn't work well for many asynchronous calls (aio_*) 
> [0].

Why? aio_error indeed returns an error code, and separate aio_return
and aio_error would not even be needed if read, write, etc returned as
I proposed, as one call could so return:
• EINPROGRESS: not yet complete
• ECANCELED: canceled
• other: return value of synchronous operation

Reply via email to