> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:24:21 -0800 Evan Gates <evan.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > headers > > ======= > > system headers (#include <...>) in alphabetical order > > empty line > > local headers (#include "...") in alphabetical order > > if there is any reason to change order, comment to explain > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:47:31PM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > If headers depend on order, the headers are broken. Dismissed.
Is this not a question of readability rather than whether it works or not? I've seen grouped by portability, ordered alphabetically, because it makes it easier to see the dependencies. > > C version > > ========= > > use C99 (why not C11? I really like anonymous unions/structs) > > suckless default is a mix of C90 and C99. C11 is a mess. Why in particular? Compiler support?
pgpUCdyPf3l34.pgp
Description: PGP signature
