Teodoro Santoni said: > Good evening, > > I'm not replying to anyone, I need a starting point to avoid demotivation for > speculating on this problem. > So, you guys wanna get your feet in lava while your hands swim in shit. > Is there something that does what, at the core, (X)HTML v.X does, without > being that shitty? > A document (or UI) format that loves to specify the tree of elements in it, > supports media elements without putting them _over_ the text, is free as in > far west freedom, and doesn't require to fuck up a parenthesis key. > Or a programming language that does what tcl/tk does, with the plethora of > tools tcl/tk offers, and can be easily restricted (it has to define rpc > services with built-in - or embedded in the #define sense - UI). The latter > is > not that mandatory, but KISS HTML would be really sad if it was unsafe for > the > clueless user. > Or both.
Tcl/Tk. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
