On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:22:12PM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote: > On July 9, 2014 10:14:16 PM EEST, Rafa Garcia Gallego > <rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Dimitris, > > > >Thanks for working on sandy! I'm skimming over the changes and they > >look promising. When you are done polishing, they would fit nicely > >upstream. > > > >In fact... does anyone use the default / non-modal sandy bindings on a > >daily basis? I find they work nicely for simple edits or when typing > >from scratch, but find myself falling back to vi(m) for heavier > >changes. > > > >We can try and keep two different config files for a while. As a side > >note: the first version of sandy was actually a GTK+ editor and had > >two different config files for Emacs and CUA/windows-like keybindings. > >Yikes. > > > >If "suckless-vi" ends up based on sandy I'll be as happy as a clam. I > >don't have a lot of free time, but I'd be happy to help. > > > >BR, > >Rafa > > Yes! I was really worried about "cancelling" your precious work, > but with 2 configs, we're happy :) I am now working on multiplying > commands (5x will delete 5 chars, etc) and then I'll clean up and > submit the final patches. The whole code has a switch to turn > completely off the whole vim-thing. > > I really hope that this is our suckless-vim :)
Sounds awesome! I hope I will find some time to stare at the code too.
