On July 9, 2014 10:14:16 PM EEST, Rafa Garcia Gallego <rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Dimitris, > >Thanks for working on sandy! I'm skimming over the changes and they >look promising. When you are done polishing, they would fit nicely >upstream. > >In fact... does anyone use the default / non-modal sandy bindings on a >daily basis? I find they work nicely for simple edits or when typing >from scratch, but find myself falling back to vi(m) for heavier >changes. > >We can try and keep two different config files for a while. As a side >note: the first version of sandy was actually a GTK+ editor and had >two different config files for Emacs and CUA/windows-like keybindings. >Yikes. > >If "suckless-vi" ends up based on sandy I'll be as happy as a clam. I >don't have a lot of free time, but I'd be happy to help. > >BR, >Rafa
Yes! I was really worried about "cancelling" your precious work, but with 2 configs, we're happy :) I am now working on multiplying commands (5x will delete 5 chars, etc) and then I'll clean up and submit the final patches. The whole code has a switch to turn completely off the whole vim-thing. I really hope that this is our suckless-vim :)
