On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote: > It's easier and takes less ram than using tabbed+st+dvtm+abduco (or a > grouping wm+st+dvtm+abduco)
Can you back this up with some actual numbers or is it just speculation on your part? The most memory demanding component in the above setup is probably dvtm's scrollback buffer whose size you can control via the -h command line option. Marc -- Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
