On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:27:57 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k...@shike2.com> wrote:
> > CEIL(x) ((int)(x) + ((x) > 0 && ((x) - (int)(x)) > FLT_EPSILON)) > > This solution begins to be too much complex. In this case I begin to > agree with Martti, and I think the best solution is to use ceil. *ceilf To the one writing the patch: Don't forget to cast the result of ceilf to int ;). Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
