On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:46:33 -0500 Eric Pruitt <eric.pru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CEIL(x) ((int)(x) + ((x) > 0)) > > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but this completely fails whenever > (x) is already a whole number; CEIL(3.0) => 4.0 which is not the correct > behaviour. Damn, you are right -.-. Back to the drawing board. CEIL(x) ((int)(x) + ((x) > 0 && (int)(x) != (x))) I couldn't come up with a better one. Maybe you do. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
