> I couldn't reproduce your exact numbers. But sure, gawk itself isn't > suckless. And?
I have removed the generated files [ytab.c and ytab.h]. > I'm here because i believe a plumber variant to be of interest to some > people around suckless. I'm not here to write a new awk. I also don't > expect to make it to sbase. Yeah, write an awk version is a big challenge, and it is something that for sure cannot be done without thinking a lot about it. It also has the problem of adding a new dependency to sbase, yacc. > Yesyesyes, i've been reading here for a while. So what. If you go on > and marry plumber and plan9's awk for me i might chime in and help you. Yes, it is really useful for st for example. St can write selected areas to stdout using PrintScr, so using a plumber with it can be a really good idea. Did you test it? -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero