On Fri, 9 May 2014 14:42:22 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k...@shike2.com> wrote:
> > Fine. Sorry. But i still doubt that implementation to be a reasonable > > choice: > > > > >>>> http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~bwk/btl.mirror/index.html > > I wanted to remark that your assertion about awk authors and awk is not true > (you know, k of awk comes from Kernighan). You sure? Latest i heard was this (not quite on topic): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.posix.austin.general/9273/focus=794 So we could ask, but again, my impression is that he's maintaining the one true awk for historical reasons. After all, here he does sort of endorse gawk: http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/awkbook/index.html Btw, what did you mean by blow process? Arnold is one of the most conservative maintainers i've seen in the gnu. Greetings - Robert Figura
