On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: > Quoth Anthony J. Bentley: >> MuPDF is nice but has a disgusting license (AGPL). > > I second that, I like mupdf very much. I quite like the license, > too, no doubt controversially.
I'm not sure why a pdf reader would need the benefits of the AGPL, which to my knowledge, ensures that versions of the code that are accessible over a network count as being "distributed" and thus require the source code to be available. Seems like the GPL would be just as good here. -- http://apgwoz.com
