That is a good idea, but I think we should probably be bolder. /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink> /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SSELP</b></u></blink> /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SURF</b></u></blink> /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>DWM</b></u></blink>
Of course we'd have to patch <blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink> to parse XHTML, but frankly it's embarassing we haven't done that yet. Quoth FRIGN: > Well, I don't think this emphasizes the SUCKLESS® corporate-identity as much > as it should. > I propose we include underscores, too: > > /usr/bin/_ST_ > /usr/bin/_SSELP_ > /usr/bin/_SURF_ > /usr/bin/_DWM_ > > Cheers > > FRIGN > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:31:21 +0200 > sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: > > Thanks for bringing up that very important issue, I was annoyed too. > > > > Here is something else that bugs me a lot: > > PLEASE SPELL DWM HOW IT OUGHT BE DONE: IN CAPITALS. > > > > I suggest other suckless projects to do so either. And I would go so far > > to capitalize the executables, too. Though, that might be too radical. > > I'd like to hear how people feel about it. > > > > Look at that: > > > > /usr/bin/ST > > /usr/bin/SSELP > > /usr/bin/SURF > > /usr/bin/DWM > > > > Don't they look much more appealing to you. Admit it! It's only habit if > > you are not immediately euphoric about this idea! > > > > Think positive, be creative, innovate, top post! > > > > * Raphaël Proust 2014-04-02 12:16 > > > Can you please include the whole message you are replying to in your > > > answers guys? It's very difficult to follow this thread if I have to > > > go back and read the previous messages and it is a very important > > > thread for the suckless group. Making good software is nice but don't > > > forget to make good communications too. > > > > > > By the way, can the person in charge of > > > https://www.facebook.com/pages/dwm/103482239693985 be a bit more > > > active? I keep telling people to try dwm (which needs to be rewritten > > > in ruby) but once they see the facebook page they say it looks dead > > > and bad. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:11:34 +0200 > > > > Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >> This is great news. Now that suckless has reached the future we will > > > >> see > > > >> a bright horizont of pleasure and commercial support. > > > > > > > > Most definitely! > > > > However, we need to build up your corporate identity. I suggest we make > > > > suckless a registered trademark and sue everyone who adopts our brand > > > > without permission. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > FRIGN > > > > > > > > -- > > > > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> > > > > > > > > > > > --s_ > > > > > -- > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> >
