Uh, you are aware that date this thread was from is over now, do you?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM, <sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > Thanks for bringing up that very important issue, I was annoyed too. > > Here is something else that bugs me a lot: > PLEASE SPELL DWM HOW IT OUGHT BE DONE: IN CAPITALS. > > I suggest other suckless projects to do so either. And I would go so far > to capitalize the executables, too. Though, that might be too radical. > I'd like to hear how people feel about it. > > Look at that: > > /usr/bin/ST > /usr/bin/SSELP > /usr/bin/SURF > /usr/bin/DWM > > Don't they look much more appealing to you. Admit it! It's only habit if > you are not immediately euphoric about this idea! > > Think positive, be creative, innovate, top post! > > * Raphaël Proust 2014-04-02 12:16 >> Can you please include the whole message you are replying to in your >> answers guys? It's very difficult to follow this thread if I have to >> go back and read the previous messages and it is a very important >> thread for the suckless group. Making good software is nice but don't >> forget to make good communications too. >> >> By the way, can the person in charge of >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/dwm/103482239693985 be a bit more >> active? I keep telling people to try dwm (which needs to be rewritten >> in ruby) but once they see the facebook page they say it looks dead >> and bad. >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: >> > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:11:34 +0200 >> > Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: >> > >> >> This is great news. Now that suckless has reached the future we will see >> >> a bright horizont of pleasure and commercial support. >> > >> > Most definitely! >> > However, we need to build up your corporate identity. I suggest we make >> > suckless a registered trademark and sue everyone who adopts our brand >> > without permission. >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > FRIGN >> > >> > -- >> > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> >> > >> > > --s_ >
