On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero > <k...@shike2.com> wrote: > >> I would still go for the function-pointer-less version of the > >> code since it actually is one line shorter, I think. The second, > >> function-pointer-less version of the code can be found below. > > > > I like more the version with the pointer function because you > > only have a copy of the loop and because the text segment of > > the executable will be smaller. > > I don't mind either way. > > Does anyone else have any strong feelings one way or the other?
I also prefer the function pointer based version.
