> By no means was this any serious benchmarking but eliminating the function > pointer did not seem to make an obvious difference.
Good job!!!! > I would still go for the function-pointer-less version of the > code since it actually is one line shorter, I think. The second, > function-pointer-less version of the code can be found below. I like more the version with the pointer function because you only have a copy of the loop and because the text segment of the executable will be smaller. -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
