sin <s...@2f30.org> writes: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:06PM +0100, YpN wrote: >> > C is generally more and efficient, I suppose. >> > >> > On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote: >> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +0000, Neo Romantique wrote: >> > >> Why Shell, and not C? >> > >> Otherwise tool looks interesting. >> > > I don't see why this has to be done in C. >> >> Actually, I don't know C but I plan to learn it in 2014. >> I might consider porting it to C, for my first practise. I wrote it in mksh >> because this is a wonderful shell and it's really powerful. And it's how I >> learn new shell hacks (creating my stuff) :) > > 2014 is the year of C :)
No, that was year 100. 2014 is the year of MMXIV. -- \ Troels /\ Henriksen
