On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:06PM +0100, YpN wrote: > > C is generally more and efficient, I suppose. > > > > On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +0000, Neo Romantique wrote: > > >> Why Shell, and not C? > > >> Otherwise tool looks interesting. > > > I don't see why this has to be done in C. > > Actually, I don't know C but I plan to learn it in 2014. > I might consider porting it to C, for my first practise. I wrote it in mksh > because this is a wonderful shell and it's really powerful. And it's how I > learn new shell hacks (creating my stuff) :)
2014 is the year of C :)
