> I'm the author of the port. I'm not sure how the suckless community > feels about Wayland, but it seems like the core protocol is fairly > lightweight, depends only on libffi, and is refreshing to work with > compared to X. Weston's goals are perhaps more orthogonal to suckless, > but I think there is potential for a suckless compositor.
Your port seems very interesting, but it is a big modification to st, which makes difficult any merge from master branch. I don't know the opinion of other st developers, but I think could be a good option factorize the code and allow different display codes. -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero ---------------------------- k...@shike2.com http://www.shike2.com
