On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:43:00PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:17:42 -0400, Carlos Torres <vlaadbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I didn't know about this > > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQyMTQ > > > > I'm both excited or looking to troll > > I'm the author of the port. I'm not sure how the suckless community > feels about Wayland, but it seems like the core protocol is fairly > lightweight, depends only on libffi, and is refreshing to work with > compared to X. Weston's goals are perhaps more orthogonal to suckless, > but I think there is potential for a suckless compositor.
I'd rather use dwm + wayland than dwm + xorg.
