On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:18:50PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Andrew Hills <ahi...@ednos.net> [10.06.2013 19:20]: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens <mstev...@etla.org> > > wrote: > > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. > > In case you don't instantly see this in Claws and didn't look into the > header, he uses Mutt! > > So @ op, what do you not like about Mutt?
mutt actually does suck less than a lot of things. I was mostly going on feeling - mutt seems complicated and insufficiently command line. Michael
