On Sun, Jun 9, 2013, at 13:31, Chris Down wrote: On 9 Jun 2013 12:29, "Łukasz Gruner" <[1]uka...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 21:04, William Giokas wrote: > > > git is not yet ready to be used as a general version control, as it has > > > no proper user-facing api. > > > > I'm unsure where you are getting this from... > > Well, I see git as a 'version control assembler' - as in "you should not > be using this directly 99% of the time". > There are many great porcelains on top of git (I like ezgit, and > currently am using legit), but they are not yet ready to just get stuff > done quickly imho. > > TL;DR git is still too complicated to use to be qualified as a simple > tool. Where's the evidence? Git makes most workflows extremely simple and trivial. First of all, I am not saying git is "bad" in any way. It just takes away much needed attention from actual work, to managing a tool which can make any workflow imaginable happen. It is not simple enough for me. References 1. mailto:uka...@fastmail.fm
