On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Łukasz Gruner wrote: > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 14:24, Markus Teich wrote: > > Please, enlighten me! > > > > --Markus > > > > > > Am 08.06.2013 13:18, schrieb Łukasz Gruner: > > > you might use a real version control instead of git. > > > > not having any particular one in mind, just one that behaves properly, > git is not yet ready to be used as a general version control, as it has > no proper user-facing api.
I'm unsure where you are getting this from... > > Anyway, > my setup for this task (not saying it is suckless, just that it works > for me) involves: > - a set of dirs for different file types (ie. dot/ for files which > whilst linking will be prefixed with a dot, bin/ for compiled stuff) > - makefile which does the hardlinking, compiling etc Actually quite a good idea, I must say. > - a set of mercurial subrepos (ie, dwm is mercurial subrepo thanks to > hg-git extension, and my own patchqueue for dwm is a subrepo parallel to > dwm - makefile understands how to deal with them) > > All the editable files are getting hardlinked and dirs - ie. ~/.vim/ - > are created. Binary files are copied. There is no automagical adding of > dotfiles to the repo. -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgpVFtvcRgFc1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
