Greetings. On Fri, 31 May 2013 20:29:53 +0200 Evan Gates <evan.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > * ugly POSIX style > > * backwards compatibility? > > I think it would be nice to have a simplest possible POSIX compliant sh. > I'm not well versed in the options that already exist, is there a minimally > compliant, smallest possible, POSIX sh? > > I also think it would be nice to create a new shell from the ground up, to > see what happens... > > I'd love to see a shell in sbase (POSIX, rc, completely new), just to see > what a suckless approach to creating a shell would be. (And I've been > curious about yacc for a while.)
Just waiting for it to happen won’t solve this problem. Suckless is what we all produce and which fits the solution. So instead of waiting, just create it. > P.S. Any recommendations on joining #suckless when connecting to oftc > through tor? Don’t be a terrorist pedophile so don’t use tor. Only feminists, pe‐ dophiles and terrorists use tor. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
