> * tab completion Does this need to be built in? Would it suck less to have a wrapper that can do tab completion that we can reuse? Something along the lines of rlwrap but without readline. Or would it suck less to create/use a different library to accomplish this?
> * ugly POSIX style > * backwards compatibility? I think it would be nice to have a simplest possible POSIX compliant sh. I'm not well versed in the options that already exist, is there a minimally compliant, smallest possible, POSIX sh? I also think it would be nice to create a new shell from the ground up, to see what happens... I'd love to see a shell in sbase (POSIX, rc, completely new), just to see what a suckless approach to creating a shell would be. (And I've been curious about yacc for a while.) -Evan P.S. Any recommendations on joining #suckless when connecting to oftc through tor?