Dnia 2013-05-27, o godz. 23:32:48 Dmitrij Czarkoff <czark...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> On May 27, 2013 11:13 PM, "Nick" <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: > > > > Netsurf's rendering libraries are pretty suckless. But they don't > > have at all complete javascript / dom support yet, so it's only as > > useful as lynx (which is to say, rather useful, but not for > > everything that is convenient to do on the web). > > NetSurf basicly only supports HTML and CSS2 (with some portion of > CSS3, but far from being complete or on par with Webkit or GECKO). > Indeed lynx is a better choice in most cases. > > Still, there is quite a lot of overengineered websites that require > JS (one of the sites I have to use regularly uses JS cookies for > session stuff), and neither lynx nor NetSurf are of any use there. > > FWIW there still quite a lot of browser-specific quirks here and > there, even including browser-specific tags, which defeats the very > idea of suckless rendering engine. > > ---- > Dmitrij D. Czarkoff I like to think that suckless browser should render web in readable and useful way, not adhere to all standards. For example support only two fonts: monospace and proportional. Only partial CSS support is needed. Problem starts with JS.
