2013/5/5, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk>: > Quoth Christoph Lohmann: >> On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:49:06 +0200 Strake <strake...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > From c40205fe15f0da048128f8735fd2140605de5e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Strake <strake...@gmail.com> >> > Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:35:58 -0500 >> > Subject: [PATCH] not roll our own utf functions >> >> Rejected due to dependency hell. > > Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right decision. Maybe include the > appropriate .c & .h file for libutf in the source tree? That's what > I do in a couple of projects. I don't have strong feelings about it, > but libutf is pretty reasonable and I'm not convinced it should be > avoided.
I also like and Christoph dislike dependency, but I agree with your proposition.
