Quoth Christoph Lohmann: > On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:49:06 +0200 Strake <strake...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > From c40205fe15f0da048128f8735fd2140605de5e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Strake <strake...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:35:58 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] not roll our own utf functions > > Rejected due to dependency hell.
Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right decision. Maybe include the appropriate .c & .h file for libutf in the source tree? That's what I do in a couple of projects. I don't have strong feelings about it, but libutf is pretty reasonable and I'm not convinced it should be avoided.
