Hi Thorsten, On 5 April 2013 15:53, Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve read you want to use OpenBSD’s ksh for sta.li. > Why don’t you use mksh instead, which is massively > more actively supported, less buggy and well-ported? > It already supports eglibc, µClibc, dietlibc, klibc, > bionic, musl, and others… > > https://www.mirbsd.org/mksh.htm > > It’s the default shell (/system/bin/sh) in Android, even. > > With klibc, you get it down to roughly 130K depending > on options (there’s -DMKSH_SMALL to get it down even > more, and klibc is missing {g,s}etrlimit() so the ulimit > builtin does nothing, though). And that’s *with* all the > functionality OpenBSD’s ksh doesn’t have.
Can you elaborate on this functionality a bit that mksh provides, but pdksh doesn't? Thanks, Anselm
