Hi, I’ve read you want to use OpenBSD’s ksh for sta.li. Why don’t you use mksh instead, which is massively more actively supported, less buggy and well-ported? It already supports eglibc, µClibc, dietlibc, klibc, bionic, musl, and others…
https://www.mirbsd.org/mksh.htm It’s the default shell (/system/bin/sh) in Android, even. With klibc, you get it down to roughly 130K depending on options (there’s -DMKSH_SMALL to get it down even more, and klibc is missing {g,s}etrlimit() so the ulimit builtin does nothing, though). And that’s *with* all the functionality OpenBSD’s ksh doesn’t have. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
