My mother was actually not pleased when she used git. She liked the idea of a suck less frontend though.
Wolfgang On Feb 12, 2013 6:57 PM, "Jens Nyberg" <jens.nyb...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/2/13 Chris Down <ch...@chrisdown.name>: > > Care to give some examples of where git sucks more than hg? I've found it > > particularly un-sucky, but non-intuitive in places. > > > > People who can not grasp git thinks it's bad, it's that simple. Irony > of it all is that it is actually a very simple design that is both > fast, reliable and annoyingly easy to work with. Sure we could cope > without all that syntactic sugar (a suckless frontend anyone?) but > that is not the fault in design but simply the tools which has way to > much options in order to please everyone and their mother. > > > On 13 February 2013 07:28, Sam Watkins <s...@nipl.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > >> > I am proposing a migration of all mercurial to git repositories. > >> > >> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things, > >> and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software > >> I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky... > >> > >> You migrated from hg to git, because *git* sucks less??? Say WHAT?! > >> > > > >
