Greetings.

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:37:27 +0100 Luis Anaya <papoan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 1. This deserves some explanation:
> 
> If you were going to translate Troff commands for email , would you
> typeset these into...
> 
> [...]
>
> d. Text - Looking at man pages, it adds a lot of terminal commands, it
> would not look nice in email.

Well,  only  needed is a subset to align text on a line, add some lines,
format a table in UTF‐8 characters, do some lists, maybe handle the ref‐
erences  automatically  in an e‐mail friendly way. Troff has implemented
much more than a simple hack would approach.

> e. HTML that's probably the "better" choice to typeset *output* for
> email from troff considering the alternatives.

No,  never.  HTML is ugly, has too many side‐effects, does not have just
two‐character commands, like most of troff has and it requires  a  whole
day  to  align  right.  Next  will be people wanting CSS, Javascript and
video files. If you add features for stupid users you  will  get  stupid
users.
 
> Yes, "but why don't you write in plain text". Good question. 

Because  running  a  justify script using troff is faster than me adding
the whitespaces manually.

> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:21:40PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> >> > typesetting? raw text can be typeset just fine with a keyboard. not
> >> > sure what you're really up to.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> It is suckless answer to HTML email.
> >> 
> > It might as well *be* HTML email.
> 
> Because it is. A rose of any other name is...

Adding HTML anywhere is not nice to the reader. You *need* a webbrowser,
which sucks up the CPU, RAM, yout time, space and lifetime. Every devel‐
oper implementing forced HTML frontends should be charged for the damage
they did to the environment – for the rest of their life. The next prob‐
lem is, like said above, that HTML sucks in too many dependencies people
will want to have.  I have never seen any troff5 effort to add video and
audio markup; which is a good thing.

I’ve  heard  the  first  »software  complexity  crime  against humanity«
charges have been brought up in front of The Hague.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann


Reply via email to