because suckless lol On 8/2/12, Kurt H Maier <khm-suckl...@intma.in> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:02:52PM +0100, Nick wrote: >> >> Bah. There's a balance to be struck. Scripts which aren't awful >> should be supported. The issue is whether using cut constitutes >> 'awful'. I think it does not. There are legitimate cases where it's >> simpler and clearer than awk/sed. >> > > The question is: since cut can be implemented IN awk, why should it get > a separate C binary? Anyone nattering about performance in a shell > script is barking up the wrong tree. > >
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Strake
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Strake
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Ryan Mullen
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Nick
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut pancake
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Ryan Mullen
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut hiro
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Uriel
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Nick
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut hiro
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Steven Blatchford
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Steven Blatchford
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Steven Blatchford
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut sjferrara
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Steven Blatchford
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Paul Onyschuk
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut hiro
- Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut Martin Kopta