Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> writes: > On 9 February 2012 10:16, Hadrian Węgrzynowski <hadr...@hawski.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:15:52 +0100 >> Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Btw. I would like you to use C and rc, not C and bash or something >>>similar. >> >> There were once discussion about "blessed" rc version, but AFAIR there >> were no simple conclusion. What version of rc is good enough? >> What I remember: Byron's version is cursed and p9p version is too big. >> So which one is good? > > Of course > > http://tools.suckless.org/9base
This one is even more bloated than the others: text data bss dec hex filename 77360 632 7496 85488 14df0 /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-static-musl 81682 2088 6344 90114 16002 /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-dyn-glibc 116849 3520 18272 138641 21d91 /opt/plan9/bin/rc-dyn-glibc 154252 4480 20120 178852 2baa4 /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-musl 862556 8176 28824 899556 db9e4 /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-glibc (Yes, the statically linked musl version is smaller than the dynamically linked glibc version of the same program.) -- Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
