On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David Tweed <david.tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My view is that the plan 9 technologies are attractive if and only if
> they're used everywhere: if a pseudo-filesystem interface was
> pervasive it would avoid the "learn another new language/technology
> tricks/etc for this task" and the problems like combinining
> responsiveness with low idle CPU usage would probably be solved. In
> contrast, there's little incentive to dig into 9P, and even less into
> IXP, precisely because so little stuff uses them.

This is correct, and this is why people use plan 9.  Is anyone here
running wmii on plan 9?



-- 
# Kurt H Maier

Reply via email to