On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David Tweed <david.tw...@gmail.com> wrote: > My view is that the plan 9 technologies are attractive if and only if > they're used everywhere: if a pseudo-filesystem interface was > pervasive it would avoid the "learn another new language/technology > tricks/etc for this task" and the problems like combinining > responsiveness with low idle CPU usage would probably be solved. In > contrast, there's little incentive to dig into 9P, and even less into > IXP, precisely because so little stuff uses them.
This is correct, and this is why people use plan 9. Is anyone here running wmii on plan 9? -- # Kurt H Maier
