On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.wo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > hm. I see. So your argument was to disown wmii, because this *specific*
> > configuration - and NOT wmii itself - requires ruby. Alright.
>
> No, I want to disown wmii because it's a bloated >30ksloc monstrosity
> that engenders other lesser monstrosities, such as this ruby idiocy.
> There is nothing "suckless" about any aspect of modern wmii and I
> can't wait for it to go away from here.
>
>
Could you perhaps list or explain some of those other lesser monstrosities?
-jf
--
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."
--Richard Stallman
"It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not
help."
-- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
