Hi Connor, On 6 November 2011 20:28, Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote: > I've been thinking about this patch for a while, and I've knocked > together a patch which takes an alternative approach, which seems to > result in a simpler diff. > > In my patch each layout has three arrangement functions, one for the > master, one the slave, and one a 'meta-layout' which defines how the > master and slave "booths" are laid out. So dwm's tile() is achieved > with an htile() meta-layout and vtile() master and slave. > > The patch is +12 lines over dwm tip.
I thought about this a while and I have to say I'm in favor to have a bold decision to apply it to hg tip in order to test this in a broader environment. This could lead to reducing the "Wildwuchs" of the other layout patches on the wiki. Cheers, Anselm
