So I guess that means no auto-tuned Richard Stallman huh? On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Paul Weber < singpol...@singpolyma.net> wrote:
> Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote: > >> From: Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> >> >>> only an idiot compares a software license to slavery. >>> >> As far as the cc-nd license RMS apparently prefers for his own audio, I >> fully agree this is hypocritical and wrong. >> > > Not to wade into a flametroll war, but for the record (in case there are > people who actually don't know) RMS believes in ND licenses for speech so > that he has a legal tool against people who take such speech out of context > or misquote it in other ways. > > -- > Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma > See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted > edition right joseph >
