On 10/23/11, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > that is a load of pretentious, presumptuous shit, "mrblog," and nobody > involved with the creation of the GPL is qualified to judge the needs > of "all users & devs, present and future." > I second that. Richard Stallman's love for cc-by-nd is enough proof that he is ready to err on the restricted side, instead of the free one.
- [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Claude Lelouch
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Stanley Lieber
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Jakub Lach
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters mikshaw
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Andreas Krennmair
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters hiro
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Aleksey Zapparov
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... hiro
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters mikshaw
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Manolo MartÃnez
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Stephen Paul Weber
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Niki Yoshiuchi
- Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipste... Bjartur Thorlacius