On 28 August 2011 21:31, Benoit T <benoit.triq...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >> On 28 August 2011 11:23, Benoit T <benoit.triq...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > BTW., i am not sure which branch i should follow right now. Someone >> > should close or merge the dangling head at rev 1565:ee4aa582320a at >> > http://hg.suckless.org/dwm >> >> That branch is a feature branch for 6.0, whereas trunk is 5.9.1. They >> aren't ready to be merged. I suspect you want the default, 'default'. > > ok i make a note that i don't need to worry and will stay on "default". > > considering the justification you give, i completely understand why you > did not use a named branch, but i understand that the right thing to do > with mercurial in that case would be to set up a separate clone to > handle the 6.0 devel branch. is that not feasible in anselm's webserver?
It would be, but that's the approach of people not being used to hg's branch handling ;) Cheers, Anselm
