hi On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 28 August 2011 11:23, Benoit T <benoit.triq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > BTW., i am not sure which branch i should follow right now. Someone > > should close or merge the dangling head at rev 1565:ee4aa582320a at > > http://hg.suckless.org/dwm > > That branch is a feature branch for 6.0, whereas trunk is 5.9.1. They > aren't ready to be merged. I suspect you want the default, 'default'.
ok i make a note that i don't need to worry and will stay on "default". considering the justification you give, i completely understand why you did not use a named branch, but i understand that the right thing to do with mercurial in that case would be to set up a separate clone to handle the 6.0 devel branch. is that not feasible in anselm's webserver? cheers -- Benoit Triquet <benoit.triquet at gmail.com> .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
