On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:45:13 -0400 Kris Maglione <maglion...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:29:35PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Alexander Teinum <atei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://github.com/alexanderte/flo > > > >Congratulations on choosing the ISC license for your project. Too > >many projects still use MIT/X these days when ISC is clearly more > >suckless IMHO: because it has less LOL (lines of license ;-) Cheers. > > I refuse to have anything to do with the people responsible for > BIND, ISC dhcp, and ISC ntp. They can do no right in my eyes. At > any rate, there's nothing wrong with the MIT license. It takes a > few seconds longer to read and is just as clear. Plus, it > explicitly extends its rights to the documentation and > explicitly allows for sublicensing, which ISC doesn't. Dan Bernstein hates BIND, too. Use the DJB license: "Public domain" Robert Ransom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
