On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Donald Allen <donaldcal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I actually offered to do this in a private message to Anselm last December. > He didn't respond. He's always been very good about responding to my emails > (and in a very gentlemanly way, I might add), so I think this one just fell > through a crack (and I'd be lying if I claimed I'd never done this myself). > That I sent it on the day before Xmas probably didn't help. In that message > I mentioned that I wasn't sure what the protocol was for fixing the patches > of others (e.g., suppose I fix a problem in a way that is not acceptable to > the original author -- what then?).
> /Don Hey Don - Aside from v4hn's previous mail; that's what the wiki's for. :) Just clone the repo, add your patch with a different name and an explanation. It doesn't have to replace v4hn's. One might work for someone's setup, the other for another's... > I don't want to take the time to do this if it won't be used. This might be part of the problem. You'd use it, right? It's probably taken more time having this short conversation than patching and committing it. Cheers, -- Andrew Antle <andrew dot antle at gmail dot com>
